From Data Scrubbing to Final Review: Check Out Verifynow's Top 5 Stringent Quality Control Measures
In today's competitive job market, verifying candidate information is crucial for making smarter recruitment strategies. But with so many background verification agencies (BGVs) out there, how can you be sure the reports you receive are accurate and reliable?
At Verifynow, we understand the importance of trust. That's why we've built a robust quality control (QC) process into every step of our background verification services. Here's how we ensure you get the most accurate and trustworthy reports:
Multi-Layered Quality Checks:
1. Data Scrubbing
Here are some possible problems that can occur during the data scrubbing process, even with a meticulous system like Verifynow's:
Incomplete Data:
Data scrubbing focuses on inconsistencies, but it can't fix missing information. Names with missing middle initials, incomplete addresses, or illegible dates of birth might slip through if they appear consistent within the document itself.
Data Formatting Issues:
Educational credentials are checked to confirm the candidate's degrees and diplomas. Education background verification process is typically done by contacting the schools, colleges and universities directly.
Eliminating Errors with Digital Forms:
Since Verifynow utilizes digital forms, the risk of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) errors is significantly reduced. This eliminates the potential for mistakes that could arise from misinterpreting handwritten documents or poor scans.
Homophones and Similar Names:
While data scrubbing can identify inconsistencies, it might miss certain challenges. For example, homophones (words that sound alike but have different spellings) can cause issues such as "Micheal" and "Michael". Knowing that it might slip through the scrubbing process, Verifynow exercises multiple documents like Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Marksheet, and educational certificate to cross-reference information and minimize the risk of accepting typos as real names.
How Verifynow Mitigates These Problems:
Manual Review:
While the system does the initial scrubbing, incorporating a secondary manual review by trained professionals can catch inconsistencies missed by the software.
Standardized Formatting:
Encouraging clients to submit documents in a specific format (e.g., digital files, specific date format) can minimize formatting issues.
Double-Checking OCR Results:
Having a process in place to verify OCR outputs, especially for critical information like dates, such as birth dates, employment start and end dates, and graduation dates, can reduce errors. This verification process can involve manually reviewing the extracted data alongside the original scanned document to ensure accuracy.
Human Expertise:
Even with advanced systems, human expertise remains crucial. Trained professionals can review the data and identify inconsistencies that OCR might miss. For example, humans can better recognize variations in date formats or handwritten numerals that could be misinterpreted by OCR software.
2. Verification at the Source
Even with the thorough approach of contacting sources directly, there can be a few challenges during verification at the source:
Unresponsive Institutions:
Some institutions, like smaller schools or those with outdated record-keeping systems, might be slow to respond or have difficulty verifying information, causing delays in the verification process.
Privacy Restrictions:
Data privacy laws or internal policies at some institutions might limit the information they can release, making it difficult to fully confirm details like salary or specific job duties.
Verification Trails:
Sometimes, the paper trail might be incomplete, especially for older employment records. This can make it challenging to definitively confirm work experience, particularly for positions far back in a candidate's career.
Fake References:
Unfortunately, some candidates might provide fake references who will confirm false information. Verifynow's additional QC steps can help identify inconsistencies that might raise red flags about these references.
How Verifynow Can Address These Challenges:
Multiple Channels of Contact:
Verifynow can utilize various methods to reach institutions, including phone calls, emails, and secure online portals to increase the chances of a timely response.
Understanding Compliance:
By staying updated on data privacy regulations, Verifynow can ensure they request information within legal boundaries.
Alternative Verification Methods:
When faced with limited information, Verifynow might use alternative methods like contacting previous colleagues or industry associations to corroborate details.
Cross-referencing and Red Flags:
Verifynow's QC process can compare information from various sources and identify inconsistencies that might suggest fabricated references.
3. Scrutinizing Every Detail
Even with meticulous human review, there's always a chance for errors during the scrutinizing stage. Here are some potential problems that can occur:
Information Overload:
Reviewing large volumes of data can lead to fatigue or information overload, potentially causing reviewers to miss inconsistencies. Verifynow combats this by implementing structured review processes with defined checklists and breaks to maintain focus.
Unclear Documentation:
Sometimes, documents provided by candidates or institutions might be poorly formatted, contain illegible handwriting, or lack crucial details. Verifynow addresses this by requesting clear documentation upfront and employing a communication channel to clarify any ambiguities with the candidate or source directly.
Hidden Inconsistencies:
Inconsistencies might be subtle. For example, a slight date discrepancy between a resume and a transcript could be missed if not carefully scrutinized. Verifynow's reviewers are trained to identify such discrepancies through close attention to detail and cross-referencing information from various sources.
Confirmation Bias:
Confirmation bias occurs when reviewers subconsciously expect certain information to be true based on previous sections of the report, potentially overlooking inconsistencies in that area. To mitigate this, Verifynow utilizes a double-review process where a second reviewer, unfamiliar with the initial findings, scrutinizes the report for inconsistencies. This ensures a fresh perspective and reduces the risk of confirmation bias impacting the final outcome.
4. Final Review Before Takeoff
There's a beauty in saying "no report leaves unchecked," but to truly showcase Verifynow's dedication to quality, acknowledging potential issues during the final review strengthens the message. Here are some possible problems that can occur:
Technical Glitches:
Though rare, technical glitches during the final formatting or system transfer could introduce inconsistencies or typos into the final report.
Formatting Inconsistencies:
Minor formatting inconsistencies might slip through the cracks, making the report look unprofessional or difficult to read.
Client Miscommunication:
If there's a misunderstanding about the specific requirements the client has for the report, the final version might not fully meet their needs.
How Verifynow Ensures a Smooth Takeoff:
Pre-Release Checks:
Verifynow can implement automated pre-release checks to identify and rectify any technical errors or formatting inconsistencies before the report reaches the final review stage.
Client Confirmation:
A final confirmation step with the client allows them to review the report and ensure it aligns with their specific requirements before it's finalized.
Detailed Delivery:
Providing the report in a clear and well-organized format, with a legend explaining any symbols or abbreviations, ensures easy understanding for the client.
5. Transparency is Key
While transparency is definitely a strength, there can still be a couple of minor issues to consider:
Information Overload:
Including a vast amount of verification proofs, while ensuring transparency, could overwhelm some clients who might struggle to find the most relevant information quickly.
Understanding Jargon:
Some verification reports might contain technical terms or industry jargon that the client isn't familiar with, hindering their ability to fully grasp the information presented.
How Verifynow Ensures Clear Communication:
Summarized Findings:
Alongside detailed proofs, Verifynow can include a clear and concise summary of the findings, highlighting key points and conclusions for easy client comprehension.
Explanation of Terms:
A glossary of terms or footnotes explaining any technical jargon used within the report can ensure clarity for clients who might not be familiar with the verification industry.
Open Communication Channels:
Verifynow can emphasize their commitment to open communication by offering clients the opportunity to ask questions or request clarification on any part of the report.
Choose the Right Partner and Process with Verifynow
Unsure which one among the many background verification companies in Bangalore to trust? Verifynow, the go to destination for most reliable background verification services in Bangalore, stands out with its meticulous QC checks, verified proof for education & experience, and transparent reports.
.jpg "verify now Dashboard")
